I mention the music because it seems to illustrate something about what I am trying to do with this blog: hearing the music, I began to move with Helena, knowing that she likes the swaying movement of dance. And suddenly, I realized that a song I had heard hundreds of time was not, in fact, a vallenato (a rhythm based on the Colombian cumbia) as I had always thought. It was a waltz. My feet knew the fact before I did, and Helena thanked me for it instantly: the waltz made her stop crying, as she had not done all afternoon.
What's the point here? Babies teach us. Not because Helena could tell me, "listen to the 3/4 measure, Dad!", but simply because around her, I reacted in a different way, cared about different things, paid attention to other aspects of the music. Before I had listened to the lyrics, thought of the child soldiers, imagined the bright sun of the morning and the smell of colombian coffee that the words evoke... but only with her and her upset stomach did I dance.
Something similar happens with these talks on philosophy. I don't have any illusions that she'll understand. But I know that she likes my voice, and that she likes to look into my eyes as I look into hers. And I learn something, simply because she is there. I have to tell the story a different way, look at the moral differently, try on a different perspective. And whether it's a waltz or poststructuralarist French philosophy, I learn something in the process.
No comments:
Post a Comment